Search for: "E W C Publishing Co." Results 21 - 40 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Since this is peculiarly w/in control of publisher, © notice tended to name publisher; led courts to figure out how author had transferred her © to the publisher, even when she hadn’t. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
This is the third in a series of recently published work that explores the legal ecology of globalization, the first within the private sector regulatory systems, the second in Marxist Leninist systems, and this third considers nature of the regulatory space created as the convergence point of regulatory systems that itself produces the parameters within which the projects of legalization and economic globalization converge. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
” 1996: Researchers at South Dakota State University publish a study showing that 60-day aging is largely ineffectual in reducing levels of E. coli O157:H7 in cheddar cheese. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:02 am by Rachel Casper
She is a co-author of 18 books published by the ABA. snelson@senseient.com John W. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(c) 2010 Incisive Media US Properties, LLC.InsuranceA Growing Need for GuidanceTrial courts struggle with consolidation vs. severance issue in post-Koken casesDaniel E. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:46 am by Guest Author
For one thing, whereas section 230(c)(2) protects the platforms from “liability,” section 230(c)(1) only bars them from being treated as publishers. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Co., Louisiana Magistrate Judge Stephen C. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm by Berin Szóka, Ari Cohn
Section 230(c)(1) does this by protecting all decisions made in the capacity of a publisher. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Fontham.Fontham, Michael R.Boulder, CO : National Institute for Trial Advocacy, (c) 2013.KF8915 .F64 2013 Evidence Lights, camera, evidence! [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am by Eugene Volokh
(MD Fla. 2017) (rejecting the interpretation that §230(c)(1) protects removal decisions because it would "swallo[w] the more specific immunity in (c)(2)"). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Doroshow: variable: we send DMCA notices to 512(a) and 512(c) providers.Rasenberger: best practices could help for repeat infringer policies and for red flag notice.Moss: some possibility for CO to offer assistance to rightsholders.Smith: our public information office does answer 100,000s of queries.Kupferschmidt: Doesn’t disagree w/one size doesn’t fit all for ISPs, but that’s also true for the creative community. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:20 am
" 2008 6 x 9 1,172 pages paper $79.95 Regular price $49.95 Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice member price e-Discovery: Current Trends and Cases By Ralph C. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:43 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Here’s how the 2d DCA framed the issue: [W]e write to address the parties’ arguments related to the scope of the probate court’s jurisdiction when faced with both an objection, which results in the filing of an independent action in circuit court, and a motion to strike a statement of claim. [read post]