Search for: "E. E.G. Y." Results 101 - 120 of 501
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Similar to the Geneva prosecutor, the Swiss Customs Administration permitted the seized items to remain with Y. and X., and simply “prohibited the couple from disposing of them. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 7:34 pm
Accusations were then traded and rupture became inevitable between the "oficialistas" and the "independientes" (for reporting see, e.g., Conflicto por Letra del Año: ¿yorubas oficialistas dejaron fuera a babalawos independientes? [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 2:05 am by Sylvia Krzmarzick, Digital Turbine
The post For Gen X, Y, and Z – The Future of Work is Mobile appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 9:21 am by admin
The essence of a failure-to-warn claim is that (1) a manufacturer knows, or should know, about a harmful aspect of its product, (2) which knowledge is not appreciated by customers, (3) the manufacturer fails to warn adequately of this known harm, and (4) the manufacturer’s failure to warn causes the plaintiff to sustain the particular harm of which the manufacturer had knowledge, actual or constructive. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Sarah A. Sutherland
This can mean that the system outputs indicate that particular outcomes are likely, e.g. a particular defendant has a 63% likelihood of rescinding. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:01 pm
Ordenen a las fuerzas del orden que protejan la propiedad social y, a la vez e indefectiblemente, el derecho de manifestación pacífica de la ciudadanía. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In the words of New York's high court, an e-mail system's "role in transmitting e-mail is akin to that of a telephone company, which one neither wants nor expects to superintend the content of its subscribers' conversations. [read post]
  The Court agreed with the plaintiffs, stating that “[w]e have no trouble concluding that the 1,853 class members suffered a concrete harm that qualifies as an injury in fact. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]