Search for: "E.G. v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION" Results 21 - 40 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 9:56 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Although consent decrees suggested otherwise, the Agency has been unwilling to specify that, with regard to health benefit claims, this standard always requires RCTs. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The new law applies to the Alberta public service, provincial agencies, boards and commissions, as well as academic institutions, school boards and health organizations. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:44 am by Jodi Frankel
 However, Commission representatives have stated that GINA would prohibit any financial incentive that is tied to a participant's disclosure of genetic information (e.g. family medical history). [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
References within the article to California decisions, while not precedential outside that state, nevertheless provide important examples of the types of workplace violence incidents that commissions and boards find compensable. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
Put succinctly, the physical presence standard for interstate taxation is clearer that the alternatives, has historical and international parallels in past caselaw and tax treaties with foreign countries, and comports with the “benefit principle” view of taxation that state spending to pay for education, health care, roads, police protection, etc., should be paid primarily by the people who most benefit from it: the people who live and work in the… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am by Josh Wright
  More likely, temperance must correlate with the social ills associated with drinking, e.g. drunk-driving, health problems, accidents and fatalities. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:38 am by Lorene Park
Discrimination Although many states prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, federal courts generally hold that Title VII does not (e.g., Jantz v Emblem Health, SDNY, 2012). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that “[t]he Charter does not confer a freestanding constitutional right to health care. [read post]