Search for: "E.G. v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION"
Results 41 - 60
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
From Matthew Wiener: On November 29, 2023, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:37 pm
When such a decision is reached, the public (e.g., consumers and competitors) may not then raise any claim to the variety in question. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission unveiled a slew of guidance and rule proposals to improve disclosures and add clarity to ESG investing, including the agency’s controversial proposal for climate risk disclosure. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
See Cantor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am
" In 1988, 2004, 2016, and 2020, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice agreed, stating "CON programs are not successful in containing health care costs, and that they pose serious anticompetitive risks that usually outweigh their purported economic benefits. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am
Mullins also described the benefits of AR for road safety. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:13 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2022. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 6:59 am
We begin with the state-action argument that has been bandied but that does not work—Shelley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
’s health insurance premium and 50% of T.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
See, e.g., Lackey v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
See, e.g. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
The state’s false claim has several benefits to its litigation posture, including: The state can claim the law only affects “Big Tech,” even though the law likely reaches dozens or hundreds of other services who are never regarded as “Big Tech. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
See Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Grymes, Kelly Drye Collier Shannon, Washington, DC Lesley Fair, Senior Attorney, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC On the FTC's radar: (1) Health claims. [read post]
