Search for: "E.S. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Another of my disciplinary heroes, in addition to Sandy, is the late E.E. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [Italy] [Motion for summary judgment][Motion denied]In Spica v Viera, 2020 WL 13401915 ( S.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 3:55 pm
Poyser, Capacity and Undue Influence 2nd ed (Toronto: Carswell, 2019) at 629 in Gefen v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Vestal, Religious State Constitution Preambles, 123 Pennsylvania State Law Review 151-190 (2018). [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:49 am
 Whether one agrees or not with the analysis of the ECtHR in either case, both might be helpful when it comes to interpreting public policy/morality exclusions in IP law, especially with regard to trade mark applications and copyright enforcement.With regard to trade marks, the test advanced by the ECThR in E.S. v Austria appears in line with the one that the Appointed Person has suggested for UK trade mark applications. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
That's part of a broader doctrine under which European countries are still allowed to punish blasphemy.The case, decided yesterday by the European Court of Human Rights, is E.S. v. [read post]