Search for: "EA v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 7:41 am
On December 21, 2010, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Pecover v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm
Ecology Center v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:13 am
(Keller v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:41 am
In Winter v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 7:53 pm
Key takeaways The Singapore High Court recently confirmed in Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General [2021] SGHC 202 (Mah Kiat Seng) that the common law doctrine of public interest immunity remains part of Singapore law and was not superseded by the enactment of the Evidence Act (Cap. 97) (EA) in 1893. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:04 am
On June 14, 2017, the District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
7 May 2009, 5:55 am
Samuel Michael Keller v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:56 pm
The Northern District of California handed down a ruling in Center for Food Safety v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
Cleare v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:34 am
However, the cases of Ferguson v IC(EA/2010/0085) (on which, see my post here) and Brett v IC (EA/2008/0098) imposed an important gloss on that principle. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm
Its 296-page EA thoroughly considered the issues. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:42 pm
Today’s case, EA v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
The courts have rarely deferred to agency expertise and discretion.In Umberger v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
The courts have rarely deferred to agency expertise and discretion.In Umberger v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
With one strategic maneuver, the plaintiffs in the O'Bannon v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:12 am
., San Luis Obispo Mothers For Peace, the State of New York, and amicus State of California (Petitioners) challenge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC or Commission) modification of the Design Basis Threat (DBT) rule and partial denial of the Committee to Bridge the Gap's (CBG) petition for rulemaking. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
Sinclair v Information Commissioner and Department of Energy and Climate Change EA/2011/0052 (08 November 2011) – Read ruling The Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (“EIR”) did not require the Department of Energy and Climate Change (“DECC”) to disclose information concerning the government’s analysis of the potential cost to the UK of strengthened climate change commitments by the EU, the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber,… [read post]
15 May 2013, 12:55 pm
Serv. v. [read post]
