Search for: "EA v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Daniel Nazer
Adding to the strangeness of today’s ruling, the same three-judge panel simultaneously issued an excellent free speech decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm by Brad Dixon
To begin, the Ninth Circuit specifically concluded that the United States Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am by CMS
It also worth noting that the appeal to the Court of Appeal in Ryanair DCA v Morais EA-2021-000275 (“Ryanair”) has been stayed pending the judgment of the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
  Two federal Courts of Appeals have now held 2-1 that the First Amendment does not protect Electronic Arts’ depiction of actual college players, so that EA may be held liable under state right of publicity laws. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 6:07 am by Florian Mueller
In fact, I made a correction earlier today to last week's report on Judge Voss's order to stay a Samsung v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:45 pm by Scott R. Flick and Elizabeth Craig
  Section 312(g) of the Communications Act states that a license shall automatically expire if a broadcast station “fails to transmit broadcast signals for any consecutive 12-month period. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:51 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:47 pm by Steve Davies
A federal judge in Colorado has shut down a uranium leasing program in that state, finding that the Department of Energy violated the National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act (Colorado Environmental Coalition v. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 6:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
The site was located in an Exclusive Agriculture 2 (EA-2) zoning district, which has the stated purpose to “preserve class I, II and III soils and additional irrigated farmland from scattered residential developments that would threaten the future of agriculture …” and “to preserve woodlands, wetlands, natural areas and the rural atmosphere of the County. [read post]