Search for: "EEOC V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2018, 7:44 am
BNSF Railway Company, No. 16-35457 (9th Cir. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:06 am
BNSF Railway Co., January 13, 2015, Gale, K.). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:24 am
The plaintiff was also ordered to provide information on the legal bases for his claims, on treatment sought by health care professionals, and on BNSF employees interviewed on his behalf (EEOC v BNSF Railway Co, June 10, 2014, Gale, K). [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:01 am
Finding no clear error in a magistrate judge’s ruling that it would exceed the scope of Rule 34 to require a railway company to allow the EEOC and an intervening plaintiff to record, onsite, the performance of all essential functions of a job for which the plaintiff was rejected due to a hand impairment and to question current employees performing such tasks in “roving depositions,” a federal district court in Kansas denied a motion to review the… [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 11:15 pm
BNSF Railway Company (10th Cir., April 11, 2017) (affirming summary judgment in favor of BNSF because plaintiff Kent Duty's limited right-hand grip strength did not constitute a disability under the ADA)Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease*Thomas v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 5:27 am
That lawsuit became EEOC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:40 am
BNSF Railway Co., August 29, 2018, Gould, R.). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 1:59 pm
In 2010, Burlington Northern Sante Fe Railway Company (BNSF) took control of the operations at Corwith. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:00 am
BNSF Railway Co., No. 14-3858 (8th Cir. 2016), plaintiff Morriss applied for employment with BNSF Railway as a machinist. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:00 am
BNSF Railway Co., No. 14-3858 (8th Cir. 2016), plaintiff Morriss applied for employment with BNSF Railway as a machinist. [read post]
Fear obesity could lead to other conditions supports rejected applicant’s regarded-as disabled claim
8 Mar 2018, 6:59 am
Employed by a company that was responsible for intermodal operations at a BNSF railyard, the applicant applied to the railway company for a safety sensitive job when it took over operations of the yard. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
The case in question, BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
” On the second question, the appeals court pointed out that the WLAD is at least as broad as the ADA, and under the appellate court’s recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:49 am
BNSF Railway Co., April 5, 2016, Wollman, R.). [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:22 am
BNSF Railway Company. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:22 am
BNSF Railway Company. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Finally, employers should avoid shifting pre-hire medical examination costs onto prospective applicants and employees in order to comply with EEOC v BNSF Railway Co., 902 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2018), a more recent Ninth Circuit opinion relating to disability. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:15 pm
BNSF Railway Co.), plaintiffs firms have doggedly filed more than 40 GIPA class actions pending in Illinois courts. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Application of the commissioned sales employee overtime exemption to a company that sells an internet payment software platform. 5. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
