Search for: "EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2015, 9:18 pm by Andrew M. Ironside
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., the Supreme Court held that a job applicant need not notify an employer... [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:28 am by Workplace Prof
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. or Young v. [read post]
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. rejected the Tenth Circuit’s holding that, to prove discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), it is an applicant’s burden to advise an employer of a religious practice necessitating accommodation. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. is here. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:29 am by Joy Waltemath
A district court’s grant of summary judgment to the EEOC finding that Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII by failing to provide a reasonable religious accommodation to a Muslim woman’s wearing of a headscarf or “hijab” was reversed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit (EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc, October 1, 2013, Holmes, J). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 12:36 pm by Holland & Hart
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. made clear that it is your motive in rejecting the applicant that matters. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 6:42 pm by Howard Friedman
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc., (ND CA, April 9, 2013), involves the question of whether Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act when it failed to hire a Muslim teenager, Halla Banafa, as a part-time stock-room employee. [read post]