Search for: "EEOC v. BNSF Railway Co." Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 6:24 am by Joy Waltemath
The plaintiff was also ordered to provide information on the legal bases for his claims, on treatment sought by health care professionals, and on BNSF employees interviewed on his behalf (EEOC v BNSF Railway Co, June 10, 2014, Gale, K). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready and Kait Pararas
   This began a ten-year legal journey that culminated on June 22, 2006 when the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in her favor in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by Kait Pararas
This began a ten-year legal journey that culminated on June 22, 2006 when the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in her favor in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
BNSF Railway Co. offered the plaintiff a job as an electronic technician, conditioned on his completing a medical history questionnaire and physical. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:00 am by Joel O'Malley
BNSF Railway Co., No. 14-3858 (8th Cir. 2016), plaintiff Morriss applied for employment with BNSF Railway as a machinist. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:00 am by Joel O'Malley
BNSF Railway Co., No. 14-3858 (8th Cir. 2016), plaintiff Morriss applied for employment with BNSF Railway as a machinist. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm by Howard Bye-Torre and Claire Rowland
BNSF Railway Co., employees filed a Title VII claim due to the employer’s failure to cover same-sex spouses under its health plan. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:52 am by Jacob A. Bruner
Finally, employers should avoid shifting pre-hire medical examination costs onto prospective applicants and employees in order to comply with EEOC v BNSF Railway Co., 902 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2018), a more recent Ninth Circuit opinion relating to disability. [read post]