Search for: "EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2012, 7:10 am by Jenna Greene
” By comparison, the lower court judge in the Eighth Circuit sexual harassment case against trucking giant CRST Van Expedited Inc. conceded that “dozens of potentially meritorious sexual harassment claims may now never see the inside of the courtroom” when she threw out the EEOC’s case for failing to fulfill the administrative prerequisites. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 9:24 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., where EEOC’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies and to properly investigate before filing led to $4.7 million in sanctions. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:26 am by Joy Waltemath
“Common sense undermines the notion that a defendant cannot ‘prevail’ unless the relevant disposition is on the merits,” the Court observed, noting that plaintiffs and defendants come to court with different objectives and that a defendant has fulfilled its primary objective whenever the plaintiff’s challenge is rebuffed, irrespective of the precise reason for the court’s decision (CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:14 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., where EEOC’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies and to properly investigate before resorting to litigation led to $4.7 million in sanctions. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:54 pm by Kathy Kapusta
“Common sense undermines the notion that a defendant cannot ‘prevail’ unless the relevant disposition is on the merits,” the Court observed, noting that plaintiffs and defendants come to court with different objectives and that a defendant has fulfilled its primary objective whenever the plaintiff’s challenge is rebuffed, irrespective of the precise reason for the court’s decision (CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]