Search for: "EEOC v. Group Health Plan"
Results 81 - 100
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2015, 5:58 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
EEOC, unanimously holding that a ministerial exception shields religious groups from employment discrimination and retaliation claims under federal law. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of… [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:58 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:47 pm
AARP v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
Plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In this case, Young v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:58 am
According to a lawsuit filed (EEOC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 7:00 am
These statutes protect employees from retaliation for reporting violations of workplace safety and health, airline, commercial motor carrier, consumer product, environmental, financial reform, food safety, health insurance reform, motor vehicle safety, nuclear, pipeline, public transportation agency, railroad, maritime, securities and tax laws; as well as for engaging in other related protected Walsh v. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:08 am
See Colagreco v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
$115 is the fee that health plans participating in the Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) process required by the No Surprises Act (the “NSA”) to resolve disputes with health care providers, facilities, and providers of air ambulance services (“providers”) over the amount the health plan will pay the provider for out-of-network health care or items for because the health plan and provider… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 3:55 am
On Monday, November 29, 2021, for instance, a Federal District Court in Missouri v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:25 pm
If you remember back to 2012 you might remember the big fight over religious organizations and their health insurance plans and the disagreement over whether they should be required to offer contraceptive coverage. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:17 am
Thus, it reversed summary judgment in Ford’s favor on the EEOC’s failure-to-accommodate and retaliation claims (EEOC v Ford Motor Co, April 22, 2014, Moore, K). [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am
Businesses & Their Leaders Face Rising FLSA Collective Action Liability Risks Improve HR Value To Company By Making HR A Performance Rather Than People Department Sponsoring Employers Face Excise Taxes, Other Liabilities Unless Health Plans Comply With ACA Out-Of-Pocket & Other Federal Rules Legal Review Of Health Plan Documents, Processes Needed To Mitigate Employer’s Excise Tax & Other Health Plan Risks EEOC ADA Suit… [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In this instance, contraceptive coverage without cost sharing would be provided to plan participants and beneficiaries through individual health insurance policies, separate from the group policy through which all other coverage would be provided to plan participants and beneficiaries. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm
Statements of President Obama made today (June 22, 2012) in celebration of the 13th anniversary of the June 22, 1999 Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 11:41 am
Participation in the wellness program was not a condition for enrollment in the County’s group health insurance plan. [read post]
