Search for: "EEOC v. Local 638" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 2:28 am
Judge McMahon said that said that [t]he little case law that appears to exist on the issue indicates that successor labor organizations may be held liable for the discriminatory acts of their predecessors, according to the same factors used to determine successor liability of corporations, citing an earlier Southern District ruling, EEOC v Local 638, 700 F. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:38 am by Lorene Park
In April, a federal district court in Minnesota ruled that a benefits fund breached the terms of the plan by terminating the enrollment of an employee’s spouse after deciding that the spouse, who is transgender, was not legally married to her husband because she was not female at birth (Radtke v Miscellaneous Drivers & Helpers Union Local No 638, DMinn 2012). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 By Cynthia Marcotte Stamer The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) has begun disclosing on its website the employer and other health plans, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates (Covered Entities) that report breaches of unsecured protected health information (UPIC) affecting more than 500 individuals as required by new rules enacted as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH… [read post]