Search for: "EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck & Co."
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 839 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1988) (holding that the EEOC failed to establish that the employer discriminated against women in hiring for commission sales positions because the court credited the employer’s “lack of interest” defense). [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 650 F.2d 14, 18-19 (2nd Cir. 1981). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 504 F. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:13 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. case (which resulted in a $6.2 million settlement), offered the following five observations on the EEOC’s view of these policies: An inflexible period of disability leave, even if substantial, is not sufficient to satisfy an employer’s duty of reasonable accommodation. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Case No. 04-CV-7282 (N.D. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:16 pm
” EEOC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 5:29 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., N.D. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 3:02 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., N.D. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:01 pm
In a record-setting consent degree, Sears, Roebuck, & Co. will pay $6.2 million to settle a class action lawsuit over disability bias as it related to the company's workers' compensation leave exhaustion policy. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:53 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., N.D. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 1:39 am
Thesis:Schultz raises the case of EEOC v. [read post]
