Search for: "EEOC v. United Air Lines, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm
United Air Lines, 10-cv-1090-ES-SCM (D.N.J. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
* The test used by Woodbridge for this evaluation was discontinue as the company had concerns as to its reliability. ** In Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc., 527 US 471, the Supreme Court suggested, but did not specifically hold, that working was a major life activity *** Relying on Mathews' physician's statement, the Post did not allow Mathews to work during this period. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:11 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:08 am
United Air Lines, Inc. (1997). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Weis Markets, Inc., No. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
United Air Lines, Inc., (D.N.J. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:31 am
United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 483, 119 S.Ct. 2139, 144 L.Ed.2d 450 (1999)). [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:55 pm
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., No. 05-1074, and United Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
United Airlines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
R.R., Inc., No. 07-2512 (6th Cir. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999), that (1) this determination must take into account mitigating measures that may prevent any such substantial limitation, and (2) the ADA's protection of individuals who are "regarded as having a disability" applies only where the individual is regarded as having an impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Osram Sylvania, Inc.2nd Cir.Comparators In Employment Discrimination Case Must Be SimilarBillue v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
This Guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
There nonetheless are a couple of issues on which the Court’s majority followed that just-cited line-up – the left plus Justice Kennedy – but for which a new appointment could realistically change the result because the issues do not necessarily track the traditional liberal-versus- conservative breakdown: executive power and preemption. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
She had to wear her hair and her clothing in a manner in keeping with the “Fox look” and was given specific talking points, questions, and on-air responses. [read post]
