Search for: "EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc" Results 81 - 99 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2013, 7:22 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In support of the commonality requirement of Rule 23(a)(2), Plaintiffs cited directly to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of 59yo Store Mgr's age/discharge claim> Drake v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:21 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Supreme Court issued three class action rulings - in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In addition to converting their class certification rulings into class action settlements with higher values and pay-outs, plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:06 am by Sheppard Mullin
Kaufman On September 16, 2011, the Ninth Circuit handed down one of the first decisions to interpret and apply the game-changing decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:02 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Unlike Wal-Mart Stores v Dukes, this was not a case that involved a policy calling for individual discretionary decisions. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although the OFCCP’s focus on current pay, rather than on pay decisions does not comport with the relevant legal standard following the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (89 EPD ¶42,827), contractors should still analyze current pay in addition to decisions impacting pay, according to experts speaking at the National Employment Law Institute’s (NELI) Thirty-First Annual Affirmative Action Briefing in Chicago, Illinois. [read post]