Search for: "ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2017, 8:42 pm
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) recently filed complaints against U.S Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for, in part, demanding social media information from Muslim American citizens returning home from traveling abroad. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:21 am
The law at issue in the Microsoft case, the Stored Communications Act, was passed as part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act in 1986. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) updated their policies in 2018 to require reasonable suspicion or a national security concern to conduct a search—but only for “advanced” “forensic” searches. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:49 am
V is anathema to VPNs—their core purpose is to not hold or collect user data and provide encryption to protect users’ anonymity and privacy. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from random government intrusion on their privacy. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Rather, it is the task of Congress to enact legislation that provides a rights-protective solution to the cross-border data problem, and ensures that Fourth Amendment standards protect digital data. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
The Electronic Privacy Information Center lists a few other contexts in which U.S. actors (including companies such as Facebook) are using facial recognition tools. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 2:42 pm
” See In the Matter of a Grand Jury Subpooena Directed to Marc Rich & Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:53 pm
Having for years enforced a constitutionally offensive border search regime at physical borders and U.S. international airports, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) recently proposed to expand its violations in troubling new ways by prompting travelers from countries on the State Department’s Visa Waiver Program list to provide their “social media identifier. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
Given the importance that mobile communications have for privacy, I believe that Kavanaugh’s opinion in Klayman v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Usually, this occurs when governments issue surveillance directives requiring production of data held outside their national borders. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
Wolf, a legal aid organization and noncitizens challenged a policy that required noncitizens awaiting credible fear interviews or review of negative credible fear determinations to be detained in facilities run by Customs and Border Protection. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Customs and Border Protection agents in border communities. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:35 am
This risks a race to the bottom, making it harder for the United States to protect the interests of its own residents and citizens, and undercutting ongoing international efforts to develop rules governing access to data across borders (see discussion of these efforts in the Part I.A. of the Electronic Privacy Information Center’s brief). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations Can “Cross-Border Privacy Rules” Trump Divergent Data Protection Laws? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations Can “Cross-Border Privacy Rules” Trump Divergent Data Protection Laws? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations Can “Cross-Border Privacy Rules” Trump Divergent Data Protection Laws? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
More information is available from the Guardian and the International Association of Privacy Professionals. [read post]
