Search for: "ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY et al" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in City of Ontario, et al., v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
April 6, 2022)(casetext version here),[1] involved documents redacted for “national security” related purposes, which may well have influenced the outcome. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
The Electronic Frontier Foundation and MuckRock, in partnership with the Association of Alternative Newsmedia, compile the year's worst and most ridiculous responses to public records requests and other attempts to thwart public access to information, including through increasing attempts to gut the laws guaranteeing this access—and we issue these agencies and officials tongue-in-cheek "awards" for their failures. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
Copyright law is territorial, and rights in works like movies, pictures, and electronic books differ by geography. [read post]
Any information obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030(1)(a) is generally inadmissible in a criminal case. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
 From the PRC side, the SSL protects information that responsible government entity(ies) identify as having vital national interest from leaking outside of the PRC. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]