Search for: "ELROD v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
Fort Bend County, June 20, 2018, Elrod, J.). 6th Cir.: CBAs clear; no lifetime healthcare benefits for Honeywell retirees. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:18 am
Fort Bend County, June 20, 2018, Elrod, J.). [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
Ref-Chem, L.P., June 11, 2018, Elrod, J.). [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:12 pm
[State of Texas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Before: WIENER, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:35 pm
As he explained in a concurrence, Justice Rehnquist was “unable to see a constitutional distinction between the governmentally imposed requirement” in Abood and that in Elrod v. [read post]
Scope of Consent to Search closed containers at issue in case before the United States Supreme Court
19 Jan 2018, 2:18 am
The United States Supreme Court is considering an appeal in the case of Gonzalez-Badillo v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:07 am
” Judge Chuang also cited Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
See Elrod v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:24 pm
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:26 am
See Jacobs v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
A leading example is the line of patronage cases that began with Elrod v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 6:10 am
For “pure patronage dismissals,” federal courts apply the narrow-justification test outlined in Elrod v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:49 am
In the first in this multi-part blog post, I’ll talk about those decisions – Elrod v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:46 am
The case is State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
Abbott (Abbott II), 748 F.3d 583 (5th Cir. 2014), Judge Elrod’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:53 am
The Supreme Court will resolve that question in Heffernan v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 4:31 am
” [FN: King v. [read post]
