Search for: "EMERSON v. STATE OF NEW YORK" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
On reply, Willard argued that “the law in New York plainly favors a buy-out as opposed to the liquidation of an on-going company – certainly one like Matrix that employs several dozen or hundreds of people at any given time. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 4:18 am by Peter Mahler
Moskowitz v Fischer Moskowitz involves an LLC formed by plaintiff Moskowitz and defendant Stevens in 2007 to acquire and develop a parcel of real property in Quogue, New York. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:00 pm by A. Robert Quirk, Muhammad U. Faridi
  Justice Emerson noted that New York public policy “favors enforcement of forum-selection clauses and supports a broad reading of those clauses. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v… [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am by Adam Faderewski
Hudspeth, 99, of New York, New York, died July 30, 2019. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am by Adam Faderewski
Hudspeth, 99, of New York, New York, died July 30, 2019. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
New York Court Dismisses Minority “Shareholder” Oppression Claim by Delaware LLC Member Does Delaware law recognize a non-dissolution cause of action for “minority shareholder oppression” of an LLC member? [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
, that he made one of them the centerpiece of "The New Property": Flemming v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Walker, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law How might a new U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
The amendment was prompted by concerns that majority shareholders could make section 1118 elections, prolong negotiations as to the fair value, and then revoke their elections, thus delaying the dissolution proceeding and exhausting the petitioning shareholder’s resources (Davidian, Corporate Dissolution in New York: Liberalizing the Rights of Minority Shareholders, 56 St John’s L Rev 24, 71 [1981]). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Second, and more importantly for practitioners, Justice Emerson’s opinion is one of the very few New York state court decisions that takes a probing look at the prevailing “substantial benefit” standard for an award of legal fees under Section 626 (e). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Second, and more importantly for practitioners, Justice Emerson’s opinion is one of the very few New York state court decisions that takes a probing look at the prevailing “substantial benefit” standard for an award of legal fees under Section 626 (e). [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Kalven, Harry, The New York Times Case: A Note on “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment”, 1964 Sup. [read post]