Search for: "EMI MUSIC, INC." Results 101 - 120 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) What happens when an opponent stops opposing: Delnorth Pty Ltd v Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd (ipwars) Urgent interlocutory and declaratory relief: AED Oil Limited & Anor v Puffin FPSO Limited (ipwars) Infringement of copyright in musical works: a riff Down Under: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (JIPLP)   Austria Austria: opposition possible from 1… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm by Oliver Kaufmann
April 2012).M.6458: Übernahme des Musikgeschäfts von EMI Group durch Universal Music Group; Märkte im Bereich des Grosshandels für physische und digitale Tonträger. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (Managing IP) (TorrentFreak) Google v China (Ars Technica) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) (China Law Blog) (IP Dragon) (China Hearsay) (China Hearsay) (China Hearsay)   Global Global - Copyright Video of Google DC ACTA debate posted online (Michael Geist) Music Biz: piracy our ‘climate change’, governments must act! [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/8cnk7BoXnw -> B2B Sales And Marketing Inhibitors http://t.co/Y2e5JLVcKJ -> CASL "this law is ridiculous as it punishes legitimate marketers from reaching out to companies" http://t.co/ukJTn91piv -> Safari workaround claimants to get their day in UK court against Google: Google Inc v Vidal-Hall http://t.co/IQVjbtAB7S -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-03-29 http://t.co/O1w0YtVayL -> blogged: Safari workaround claimants to get… [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:49 pm
Some critics have called for measures to force Apple to make the music it sells on its online iTunes music store compatible with MP3 music players other than its own iPods. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:13 pm by Kevin
Mainly because I can’t really tell who is in the proposed class: The Settlement Class is defined as: a) all Persons who, at any time since September 3, 1949, directly paid Defendants, Intervenors or their predecessors-in-interest (or either’s Affiliates) for each such Person’s use of the Song; (b) all Persons who, at any time since September 3, 1949, directly paid HFA, Alfred or Faber as agents for Defendants or their predecessors-in-interest for each such Person’s use… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
- motionbox online video hosting Terms and Conditions – perpetual licence to use user content (1709 Copyright Blog) BitTorrent may kill Zombieland sequel, writer claims (TorrentFreak) Pre-release music piracy: further arrests, exec loses job (TorrentFreak)   Global - Trade Marks & Domain Names Losing your Twitter naming and branding just bad business (The Product Naming Blog) (Innovationpartners) Beatles’ records on apple-shaped USB-stick – do I sense a little… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
- motionbox online video hosting Terms and Conditions - perpetual licence to use user content (1709 Copyright Blog) BitTorrent may kill Zombieland sequel, writer claims (TorrentFreak) Pre-release music piracy: further arrests, exec loses job (TorrentFreak) Global - Trade Marks & Domain Names Losing your Twitter naming and branding just bad business (The Product Naming Blog) (Innovationpartners) Beatles' records on apple-shaped USB-stick - do I sense a little provocation? [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
- motionbox online video hosting Terms and Conditions - perpetual licence to use user content (1709 Copyright Blog) BitTorrent may kill Zombieland sequel, writer claims (TorrentFreak) Pre-release music piracy: further arrests, exec loses job (TorrentFreak) Global - Trade Marks & Domain Names Losing your Twitter naming and branding just bad business (The Product Naming Blog) (Innovationpartners) Beatles' records on apple-shaped USB-stick - do I sense a little provocation? [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
’: (IP finance), Allied Security Trust – High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright On distinguishing between creative commons, the public domain, and all rights reserved – confusion in mainstream media: (creativecommons.org), Inside views: a new business model for the music industry explained: (Intellectual Property Watch),… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal to register shape of temperature control device due to lack of acquired distinctiveness: In re Johnson Controls, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(Afro-IP)   Australia Preliminary question: does applicant own copyright it is seeking to enforce: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (LawFont)   Canada Canadian copyright collecting agency subverting open debate on copyright (Boing Boing) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) CMEC seeks review of K-12 Copyright Board tariff (Excess Copyright) The return of Captain Copyright? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]