Search for: "ENTERGY NUCLEAR V US"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
In supplemental briefing before the trial court in this case, the government outlined its intended use of the defense. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:05 pm
Last year, in Entergy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:36 am
On appeal, Entergy argued that federal nuclear power plant regulations establish public policy governing facial hair and respirator use and that these regulations prohibited fit-testing the employee with 3–4mm of facial hair on his chin. [read post]
21 May 2017, 6:48 am
Entergy Operations, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
(Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:08 am
” In Hills v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:56 am
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster — the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has convened a task force to consider changes to US nuclear safety regulations based on the experience with the Fukushima reactors meltdown. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:32 pm
(Notice of Denial at 19, fn.1.) [2] Draft Policy, Appendix A at 11. [3] Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
(Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
