Search for: "EPA v. California"
Results 101 - 120
of 682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of California granted summary judgment for the Plaintiffs in National Association of Wheat Growers et. al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:29 am
If EPA's press release is any indication of what it will say in its formal denial of the petition, it looks like it is going to bungle this as badly it did the petition at issue in Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:02 pm
Backstrom, and James V. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:39 pm
In the case of Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:45 am
The Court’s opinion in Sackett v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Lofts, Steve Lowry, Gregory V. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 4:55 am
Today at AEI: Panel (and webcast) on Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am
It was approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1974. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:49 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 10:53 am
Although EPA initially chose to exclude these uses from its analysis, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered EPA to include them following a successful legal challenge lodged by consumer groups in Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:48 am
EPA in the face of the climate hawks. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:07 am
Not a single Justice in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court, by reversing the Ninth Circuit on June 22, 2015, has terminated the decades-old litigation over the Department of Agriculture’s administration of the California Raisin Marketing Order. [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:02 pm
EPA] In 2007, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:53 am
The omission: California released a new 2007 model and submitted new data, which the EPA approved in 2008. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:37 am
KUCIEMBA v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:22 am
Tyco agrees but argues that since the EPA has not yet approved the remediation plan, there is no plan in place. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:23 am
Supreme Court’s EPA Ruling Under Major Questions Doctrine Could Impact Employers In West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of People of the State of California and the City of San Diego v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:17 pm
Other lawsuits have followed, including Center for Biological Diversity v.Johnson (filed 2002, stipulated injunction entered October 2006 requiring EPA to make effects determinations and enter consultation, as appropriate, on the impact of 66 pesticide active ingredients on California red-legged frogs and critical habitat), Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
