Search for: "EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
”[6] What about Plessey v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
Only the District of Columbia bans camera coverage of all judicial proceedings. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am
Initially, it appeared that the nomination eligibility requirement would be fairly innocuous considering, as the SEC noted when approving the new rules, it is generally understood that no laws exist in any state or the District of Columbia that prohibit shareholder nomination rights. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
