Search for: "EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am by Kara OBrien
Initially, it appeared that the nomination eligibility requirement would be fairly innocuous considering, as the SEC noted when approving the new rules, it is generally understood that no laws exist in any state or the District of Columbia that prohibit shareholder nomination rights. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 35.150(d), are enforceable by private right of action.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for Disability Rights Advocates et al.Amicus brief for Richard M. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
District of Columbia, et al. (07-335), is a companion to the District of Columbia’s appeal on the scope of the Second Amendment “right to keep and bear arms. [read post]