Search for: "ESTRADA v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 11:01 am
Amaral-Estrada (SD Ind., Judge Barker), a 16-page opinion, Judge Bauer concludes:For the reasons stated above, the district court did not err in denying both Amaral-Estrada's and Lira-Esquivel's Motions to Suppress Evidence. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:11 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
Estrada’s Conflict with Wesson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:38 am
In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:52 pm
On March 23, 2022, in Estrada v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 4:44 pm
California state trial courts are now free to decide if they will follow Estrada or Wesson. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
Telefonos de Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
“Necessity” is the mother of discretion.United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:18 am
In Estrada v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Behrend and the class) and Miguel Estrada of Gibson Dunn (for Comcast). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:22 am
From those three facts you already know that it's probably a border crimes case; most likely, being arrested for being in the United States illegally after being deported. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:34 pm
The 9th effectively overrules Estrada-Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
So begins the Conclusion of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division in the case of Méndez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:44 pm
In Fox Television Statements, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:06 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Estrada provided a detailed description of the person he had seen, stating he had no doubt defendant was that man. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 6:22 am
NLRB and Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
