Search for: "EX PARTE MICHAEL JOSEPH GRAY, Applicant" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
”  Yet 101 is controversial – the rate of ex parte decisions addressing 101 has also shot up, from less than 10% to over 80% in 2018 in medical diagnostic and software technology areas, and to 26% overall. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am by Jim Sedor
The commission has stressed it used a process in which evaluators did not know the identities of any of the applicants. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
– slow progress of NZ patent reform (PatLit)   Netherlands District Court The Hague – Ex parte decision against Drogisterij.net in extended wear contact lens patent dispute: Novartis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
(IP finance) US General - Decisions PepsiCo's $1.2 billion court no-show in trade secrets misappropriation case brought in connection with AquaFina bottled water (IPKat) Adequately indentifying trade secrets in California trade secret misappropriation litigation: Brescia v Angelin (JIPLP) US Patent Reform Patent 'reform' may happen this year, after all (Patent Docs) US Patents Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style opposition… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
(IP finance)   US General – Decisions PepsiCo’s $1.2 billion court no-show in trade secrets misappropriation case brought in connection with AquaFina bottled water (IPKat) Adequately indentifying trade secrets in California trade secret misappropriation litigation: Brescia v Angelin (JIPLP)   US Patent Reform Patent ‘reform’ may happen this year, after all (Patent Docs)   US Patents Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
(IP finance) US General - Decisions PepsiCo's $1.2 billion court no-show in trade secrets misappropriation case brought in connection with AquaFina bottled water (IPKat) Adequately indentifying trade secrets in California trade secret misappropriation litigation: Brescia v Angelin (JIPLP) US Patent Reform Patent 'reform' may happen this year, after all (Patent Docs) US Patents Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style opposition… [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
 Now, free patent data (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Inventive Step) Seven ideas for reducing foreign filing costs (IP Watchdog) Patent arbitration resource – ‘Rules for Non-Administered Arbitration of Patent & Trade Secret Disputes’ (IP ADR Blog) Patent application pendency: Percent of applications still pending (Patently-O) (Patently-O) Rejecting is better than allowing (Just an Examiner) US patent counts, Q2 2009 (Patent Librarian's… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, (IPKat), (IPKat), (Class 46), (IPKat), (IP Law360), Quanta – Supreme Court reverses CAFC decision in Quanta v LG Electronics; method patents exhaustible: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Updates), (Hal Wegner), (Patently-O), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Patent Docs), (Agricultural Law Blog), (Filewrapper), (Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Philip Brooks), (Philip Brooks guest blog), (IP ThinkTank), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (IAM), (IAM), (IPBiz),… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
, US CAFC throws out jury patent infringement verdict, raises potentially invalidating prior art: Finisar v DirecTV: (Patent Prospector), (Hal Wegner), (EDTexweblog.com), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Law360), (Patently-O), (Patently-O), Global Global - General Further resolution needed to keep IP issues in WTO negotiations: (Intellectual Property Watch), Mobile phone manufacturers seek to control rising IP costs: (Intellectual Property Watch), Managing trade secrets for… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The result, Stanford law professor Michael McConnell told the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]