Search for: "EX PARTE WES GOODE, Applicant"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2018, 2:57 am
" In this ex parte appeal, since the cited mark is registered on the Principal Register, the Board must assume that it is at least suggestive. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:33 pm
That's a good thing. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 3:13 am
The Board pointed out that the USPTO is not a party in an ex parte appeal, but rather is merely fulfilling its role regarding the examination of applications. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:14 pm
When we prepared a Response to RFE for our client, we requested to change our client’s I-751 from joint filing to a waiver of joint filing because our client entered into the marriage in good faith, but the marriage was terminated through divorce or annulment. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:28 pm
Ex Parte Fu (Appeal 2008-0601), March 31, 2008In a somewhat unremarkable, yet meaningful decision, the BPAI upheld a 103 rejection on an application related to an electrostatographic imaging member having a charge transport layer containing a specified surfactant that reduces crystallization of the charge transport layer material. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
” 4 We all recognize that good information is valuable. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
” 4 We all recognize that good information is valuable. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
Also important to know it was Judge Rich—ex parte, w/just a gov’t lawyer and an applicant—shows how these things can go wrong/off the rails. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:06 pm
And here is an even worse part of this story, if that is possible. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
While the subject application was pending (and suspended), the federal court in Arizona ruled in favor of Applicant FCA US LLC (f/k/a Chrysler Group LLC) in a trademark infringement and unfair competition action brought by the cited registrant, but the Board found that the court rulings had no estoppel effect on the Board’s determination of this ex parte appeal. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:22 pm
To further simplify and streamline the appeals process, the USPTO has now published a notice of proposed rulemaking that proposes to rescind the stayed 2008 Final Rule and asks for your comments on a number of proposed changes to the rules currently governing ex parte appeals. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:02 am
I have even called the fraud hotline to report ex-employees claiming they were let go for lack of work when clearly that was not the case and was told that is what applicants are instructed to do. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 8:15 pm
.” Today we covered a lot of ground, from trademark clearance, to bases for registration refusal, to ex parte appeals. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 3:33 am
Here we go again! [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
Takeaway: In Ex parte Boucherie, the Applicant claimed a method of manufacturing a plunger for a medical syringe. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:16 pm
In this last part of our series, we look at proposed legislation related to intellectual property issues. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:52 am
The utilization of this ex parte seizure does not come without risk. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:03 am
This is noted by Justice Mosley:[82] The duty of full and frank disclosure in an ex parte proceeding was discussed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Ruby v Canada (Solicitor General) 2002 SCC 75, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 3 at para 27: In all cases where a party is before the court on an ex parte basis, the party is under a duty of utmost good faith in the representations it makes to the court. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:38 am
Part I can be found here. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:27 am
Whereas in 2014, in a similar scenario, the applicant had sent a warning letter to the defendant, the Court found it odd that no warning letter had been sent this time: “4.11 We consider that the omission behavior on the part of […], of not having sent a warning letter before filing the request for precautionary measures, in coherence with its own previous acts and, in addition, a few days ahead of an international trade fair, may not be entirely in line… [read post]
