Search for: "EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION"
Results 81 - 100
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 3:23 pm
., Chevron Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation and Royal Dutch Shell plc). [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:00 am
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY: Exxon Mobil's CEO says his energy company's "corporate social responsibility" is to produce more energy. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
By Joanne Cursinella, J.D.Texas Republican Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, has sent a letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White requesting relevant information concerning the SEC’s investigation into Exxon Mobile Corporation. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
[8] Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation (DC Cir, 8 July 2011) slip op, page 50 (Rogers J) [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 4:29 pm
If I asked you which of the following phrases best represent your perception of Exxon Mobil, would you choose: a. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:44 am
Exxon Mobil Corporation is an example of the misfortune that can befall the purchaser who assumes the burden of comprehensive, one-sided indemnity obligations. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:16 pm
Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation, et al. and Chauvin v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:02 pm
Supreme Court has issued an opinion reducing the amount of the award of punitive damages against Exxon Mobil Corp. related to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill – from $2.5 billion to just $507 million, an amount equal to the compensatory damages in the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:02 pm
Supreme Court has issued an opinion reducing the amount of the award of punitive damages against Exxon Mobil Corp. related to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill – from $2.5 billion to just $507 million, an amount equal to the compensatory damages in the case. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al., issued an important decision interpreting the scope of the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (TSWDA) as it pertains to judicial review of and the burden of proof for certain administrative cleanup orders issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:03 pm
Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al., and involves the cleanup of the Voda Petroleum State Superfund Site (VPSSS). [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 6:39 pm
Exxon Mobil Corporation (10th Cir., June 6, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Exxon Mobil as Jenkins-Dyer was not a named beneficiary)Miscellaneous*Mahalaxmi Amba Jewelers v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:55 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., et al., No. 09-7125 (consolidated) (D.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued its third opinion on August 19 in the decade-long fight between Exxon Mobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) and the US government over who is responsible for the costs incurred in remediating ExxonMobil’s Baytown and Baton Rouge refineries and nearby chemical facilities (the plants), which were used to produce aviation fuel and rubber during World War II and the Korean War under extensive government control. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued its third opinion on August 19 in the decade-long fight between Exxon Mobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) and the US government over who is responsible for the costs incurred in remediating ExxonMobil’s Baytown and Baton Rouge refineries and nearby chemical facilities (the plants), which were used to produce aviation fuel and rubber during World War II and the Korean War under extensive government control. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:47 am
In the investigation into the accuracy of Exxon Mobil’s statements regarding the possible effects of climate change on the company, an email alias of former CEO Rex Tillerson, now Secretary of State, was discovered. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued its third opinion on August 19 in the decade-long fight between Exxon Mobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) and the US government over who is responsible for the costs incurred in remediating ExxonMobil’s Baytown and Baton Rouge refineries and nearby chemical facilities (the plants), which were used to produce aviation fuel and rubber during World War II and the Korean War under extensive government control. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued its third opinion on August 19 in the decade-long fight between Exxon Mobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) and the US government over who is responsible for the costs incurred in remediating ExxonMobil’s Baytown and Baton Rouge refineries and nearby chemical facilities (the plants), which were used to produce aviation fuel and rubber during World War II and the Korean War under extensive government control. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued its third opinion on August 19 in the decade-long fight between Exxon Mobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) and the US government over who is responsible for the costs incurred in remediating ExxonMobil’s Baytown and Baton Rouge refineries and nearby chemical facilities (the plants), which were used to produce aviation fuel and rubber during World War II and the Korean War under extensive government control. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued its third opinion on August 19 in the decade-long fight between Exxon Mobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) and the US government over who is responsible for the costs incurred in remediating ExxonMobil’s Baytown and Baton Rouge refineries and nearby chemical facilities (the plants), which were used to produce aviation fuel and rubber during World War II and the Korean War under extensive government control. [read post]
