Search for: "Eady v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Eady CTB v News Group Newspapers and Imogen Thomas [2011] EWHC 1232 (QB) has been widely discussed in the media (and was the subject of a case comment on this blog). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
CTB v NGN [2011] EWHC 1232, in which Eady J prevented publication of the name of Ryan Giggs as the premiership footballer who had been in a relationship with Imogen Thomas. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 8:41 am
Spencer v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Moore v Secretary of State for Transport and Another Court of Appeal “A cause of action for damages against the government for failure to implement Community law resulting in failure to provide a remedy in a personal injury case accrued as soon as some measurable damage had been suffered The Court of Appeal so stated when dismissing the appeals of: (i) Derek Keith Spencer against the dismissal… [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm by INFORRM
The recent decision in Tamiz v Google (High Court, Eady J) comes at a very important time for the debate on the liability of Internet intermediaries. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
Eadie says in substance the subject matter is the same because it relates to the state’s foreign relations. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
   The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm by INFORRM
  On 13 May 2010 Mr Justice Eady struck out the libel claim in Kaschke v Osler ([2010] EWHC 1075, see our post here). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm by Daithí
Last week’s decision in Tamiz v Google (High Court, Eady J) comes at a very important time for the debate on the liability of Internet intermediaries. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal in England & Wales has handed down its judgment in the matter of Howard Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland [2019] EWCA Civ 648, on appeal from the decision of Sir David Eady, sitting as a judge of the High Court on the Queen’s Bench Division Media and Communications List. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
In response James Eadie QC states that withdrawal need not be a joint effort but, if it must be, Parliament’s decision to pass the European Union Referendum Act 2015 is sufficient cooperation with the Government. 14.33: James Eadie QC states “The Government has the constitutional responsibility and ability… to make and ratify treaties. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am by Graeme Hall
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011): No error of law deporting Bangladeshi man convicted of complicity in shooting. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
Coming soon… Max Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]