Search for: "Eager v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am by Daniel Carpenter-Gold
Photo from Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).On Monday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  “Rather, the theories of the administrative state, the public interest, and the judicial process were part of the general atmosphere of thought surrounding the justices. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am by Marc DeGirolami
I have found that a good meme can do as much to make, say, Marbury v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:56 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Lara White (UK)
  Indeed many will be eager to see the adequacy decision finalised, particularly Meta which is expecting to receive an order from the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (enforcing the Schrems II judgment) which may ban its EU-US data transfers. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Mary Moynihan
Pritchard and Thompson argue that the Court permitted the SEC to fill in statutory gaps to attack insider trading and overtake areas of state authority, even extending implied federal rights of action to shareholders in the case of Superintendent of Ins. v. [read post]