Search for: "Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc."
Results 41 - 48
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
: (Patent Docs), Generic drug developers will continue to take advantage of global demand for lower-priced drugs, with Teva poised to maintain lead position says Goldman Sachs analyst: (GenericsWeb), Daiichi Sankyo takeover of Ranbaxy: (Profitability through Simplicity), (Spicy IP), (GenericsWeb), Canada: Generics to penetrate 26% pharma market in Canada says RNCOS research: (GenericsWeb), Canada: Generic drug makers spreading misinformation about patent regulation amendments to dodge real story:… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Owens, 13-719 (granted at the April 4 Conference, relisted once); Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:49 pm
Bennett is currently a NFL free agent; and Charges of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and health care fraud against: Correll Buckhalter, a former NFL running back who played with the Philadelphia Eagles from 2001 to 2008 and the Denver Broncos from 2009 to 2010; Etric Pruitt, a former NFL special teams and safety who after having little playing time for most of his NFL career played a major role in Super Bowl XII while signed to the Seattle Seahawks. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
Aug. 5, 2022) -- affirming district court’s decision that Exemption 4 protected portions of pharmaceutical company's successful application for accelerated approval of a drug. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
The first agreement was with Hologic Inc., a Bedford, Mass. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Amgen, Inc., No. 07-1999 "In an action against defendant charging fraudulent pricing of pharmaceutical drugs in violation of Wisconsin state law, an order remanding the case and sanctioning defendant is affirmed in part as to the remand order, but reversed as to the sanctions where: 1) the filing of a suit under the False Claims Act did not render this case removable; and 2) the paucity of appellate authority on the removability issue gave defendant a reasonable basis for… [read post]
