Search for: "Eakin v. Eakin" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
  Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers… [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
* Endoscope and remedial scope: inside view of an application for summary judgment Medical Innovations Ltd v Eakins and others is a Chancery Division, England and Wales decision delivered by Richard Meade QC. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 4:01 pm
 Jonesy's refrain was referring to bayonets but nowadays, when most folk rarely encounter a bayonet outside a war museum, those words might be more applicable to endoscopes, the subject of Medical Innovations Ltd v Eakins and others. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a wordy December 15, 2014 decision in the homeowner's insurance contract dispute case of Bruno v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:13 am by Daniel E. Cummins
A split Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a ruling on January 21, 2014 in the case of Lance v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In an uninsured motorist benefits case that has gone all the way up the appellate ladder, back down again, and, now, all the way back up, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the matter of Vanderhoff v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:46 am by Daniel E. Cummins
State Farm, No. 35 MAP 2012 (Pa. 2013)(Majority:  Castille, C.J., Eakin, J., Todd, J.) [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am by Bexis
Cricket Lighters, 841 A.2d 1000 (Pa. 2003), three justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (Saylor, Castile (CJ) and Eakin) joined a concurring opinion stating that Pennsylvania’s old “super-strict” liability regime in place since Azzarello v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
  And in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Vernon L. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by Ken Kersch
James Bradley Thayer played a role in this (as he did in recovering Pennsylvania Judge John Bannister Gibson’s dissent in Eakin v. [read post]