Search for: "Economy Light & Power Co. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
But they were not powerful enough to create gold. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Maricopa Co. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
United States . . . [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Dawes off the hook (kinda) – the reformers in power in DC stripped Indians of their property rights without tribal consent (the cases of Lone Wolf v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:58 am
The maximum 8.5 years of data protection available in the Canadian system must be considered in light of the maximum term of 8.5 years in the United States for chemical products and 12 years for biologic products, the maximum of 11 years in the European Union, and the up to 8 years equivalent protection with potential additional time available in Japan. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am
The following post is by Mark Graber, co-editor with Mark Tushnet and Sanford Levinson of the recently published Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Traditional notion of int’l law is power projection of individual states that are normatively neutral and you don’t look inside them. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
U.S. authorities have declined to name the countries whose military bases the United States might wish to use, but the Journal points to Egypt and Tunisia as possibilities in light of recent U.S. dealings with both countries. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
” With few exceptions, the first 200-odd years of Privacy in the Unites States primarily concerned contexts where the identifiable nature of the data in question was not seriously in doubt. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
(citing, inter alia, Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
Holmes Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States, to name but a few. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
In 1935 in Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
