Search for: "Edelman v Berman" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Retainer Agreement Not A Prerequisite for an Attorney-Client Relationship
2 Jul 2021, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Edelman v Berman  2021 NY Slip Op 04120 Decided on June 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department presents an interesting real estate legal malpractice claim. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
An Unusual Conversion Claim Against An Attorney
19 Jan 2024, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
And, with respect to the Airmax case, the defendants failed to demonstrate, prima facie, that there was no attorney-client relationship between them and the plaintiff (see Edelman v Berman, 195 AD3d 995, 997). [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
Fraud, Yes Legal Malpractice, No.
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“‘When a plaintiff brings a cause of action based upon fraud, the circumstances constituting the wrong shall be stated in detail'” (Edelman v Berman, 195 AD3d 995, 997, quoting Sargiss v Magarelli, 12 NY3d 527, 530 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see CPLR 3016[b]). [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/