Search for: "Eden v. Eden" Results 1 - 20 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2013, 6:05 pm by Reproductive Rights
RH Reality Check: Sixth Circuit Issues Strong Opinion Against For-Profit Religious Rights in Eden Foods Case, by Jessica Mason Pieklo: . . .On Thursday, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals . . . in Eden Foods v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, (EEOC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 1:22 am by J
Lawtel had an interesting note on a permission to appeal case earlier this week – Mount Eden Land Ltd v Bolsover Investments Ltd (Ch.D, 20.6.14). [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:43 am
By Jim Butler and the Global Hospitality Group® Hotel Lawyers | Authors of www.HotelLawBlog.com 27 March 2013 Hotel Lawyer with a major legal development on terminating hotel management agreements -- Marriott v Eden Roc. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:02 am
By Jim Butler and the Global Hospitality Group® Hotel Lawyers | Authors of www.HotelLawBlog.com 1 April 2013 Hotel owners: How the appellate decision in Marriott International v Eden Roc can affect your hotel investment (and why you should understand the law behind the court's decision) As we reported in our 27 March 2013 blog, a New York Appellate Division court made it possible for the owners of the Eden Roc Renaissance hotel in Miami Beach to oust Marriott as its… [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 am
April 26, 2016 - 11 AM: Edens Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:34 am by Rebekah
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals says yes in the copyright infringement case of Eden Toys, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:34 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.February 7, 2023 - 1 PM: Eden Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:22 am
Consideration of hearsay evidence in a Section 75 disciplinary hearing permittedMatter of Ebling v Town of Eden, 59 AD3d 978The Appellate Division confirmed the dismissal of Stephen Ebling from his position following a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75.The court rejected Ebling’s contention that the evidence presented at the hearing did not support his being found guilty of the charges preferred against him. [read post]