Search for: "Edwards v. California" Results 221 - 240 of 1,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
”  In 2008, the California Supreme Court, in Edwards v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am by Eric Goldman
Section 1983”; (3) “damages under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act”; (4) breach of contract; and (5) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:37 am by SHG
Given the state of the law on border searches of electronic devices, Judge Edward Korman issued a practical, if unsatisfactory, warning in Abidor v. [read post]
Even before the California Supreme Court decided Edwards in 2008, employers knew all too well the woes of attempting to enforce non-competes against California employees. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:02 pm by Cindy Cohn
At a federal court hearing last month in Oakland, California for our Jewel v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Big Data Analytics, Online Terms of Service and Privacy Policies, Research Handbook on Big Data Law edited by Roland Vogl, 2019, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Forthcoming, Przemysław Pałka and Marco Lippi, Yale Law School Center for Private Law and Università degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE) Online Impersonation: I Have a Right to Be Left Alone v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
The Center for Internet and Society blog has posted a series of comments on the California  Consumer Privacy Act [pdf] The IpKat blog has a piece by Jessica Banks “Smart watches: a helping hand or sinister culture of surveillance? [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:05 am by James Kachmar
  The AMN Healthcare Court relied heavily on the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Edwards v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:15 am by James Goodman
In doing so, the Court adopted the primary holding of AMN – that contractual prohibitions barring solicitation of employees are invalid under the California Supreme Court’s reasoning in Edwards v. [read post]
App. 2018), the court rejected a “reasonableness” approach to employee non-solicitation provisions, emphasizing the plain language of section 16600 and the California Supreme Court’s decision in Edwards v. [read post]