Search for: "Edwards v. Franke" Results 141 - 160 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm by Lucy Reed
’ JCL 73 (48) 1 February 2009 (S Edwards)) that these provisions of the FPR 2010 ‘potentially subvert s 98(2) of the 1989 Act, arrogating the FPR above statute’. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
The Emperor Caesar Flavius Justinian, conqueror of the Alamanni, the Goths, the Franks, the Germans, the Antes, the Alani, the Vandals, the Africans, pious, prosperous, renowned, victorious, and triumphant, ever august, To the youth desirous of studying the law:The imperial majesty should be armed with laws as well as glorified with arms, that there may be good government in times both of war and of peace, and the ruler of Rome may not only be victorious over his enemies, but may show… [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:35 am by Tara Hofbauer
James Pohl, the judge in the Guantanamo case of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:02 am by Paul M. Secunda
Franks, No. 13-483 (June 19, 2014), while two subsequent posts will discuss the labor law cases of Harris v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:58 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [official website] unanimously Thursday in Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm by Ruthann Robson
Franks (Art Lien) The case involves Edward Lane, who had been director of a program for at-risk youth at Central Alabama Community College (CACC). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Franks applies these rules, and in the process in some small measure reaffirms government employee speech protection. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am by Amy Howe
Franks, involving the First Amendment protections available to a public employee who testifies in court. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At the IIT Chicago-Kent Faculty Blog, Christi Guerrini and Edward Lee discuss (and make predictions regarding) Monday’s oral argument in the patent case Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]