Search for: "Edwards v. Nickels" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2018, 4:52 am by Brian Cordery
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Judge adopted largely similar reasoning in the ARC case as he had in Edwards. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Brian Cordery
Indeed, the Court of Appeal in its recent judgment in Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific [2018] EWCA Civ 673, decided not to interfere with HHJ Hacon’s judgment that of the two patents in suit relating to replacement heart valves, one was valid and infringed (EP’254) and the other invalid (EP’766). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:24 pm by Rumpole
State, 790 So. 2d 1177, 1178 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (quoting Nickels v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
Such a definition, be it heuristic or conceptual, has been accepted by at least some philosophers (see James Nickel, ‘Is there a Human Right to Employment? [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
It can be difficult to hold governmental bodies accountable based on regulatory authority using the modified Anns/Cooper test in conjunction with Edwards v. the Law Society of Upper Canada.. [read post]
The case is directed to a nickel-chromium alloy with high oxidation and carburization resistance, long-term breaking strength and creep resistance. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]