Search for: "Edwards v. State of Oregon" Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2021, 4:55 am by David Oscar Markus
But the Ramos opinion left open the question of whether the decision applied retroactively.The case decided by the court on Monday, Edwards v. [read post]
Lee
8 Jul 2010, 12:23 pm by Jon Sands
Smith concurred, focusing on the lack of AEDPA deference given to the state courts by the district court under AEDPA.U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:05 am by NCC Staff
The states of Oregon and Texas fought the Voting Rights Act provision and a divided Supreme Court, in Oregon v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am by Amy Howe
The case decided by the court on Monday, Edwards v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm by Amy Howe
Oregon, which held that the right to a unanimous jury did not apply to the states, did not carry any precedential weight. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As a result of Ramos, the two states that had been permitting and using non-unanimous jury rules for criminal trials—Louisiana and Oregon—were required to retry (or let free) the several hundred convicted persons in those states whose juries were not unanimous and whose cases were still on direct appeal.Last month, in Edwards v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Five states (Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, and Oregon) implemented a pass-through entity election to serve as a workaround to the federal state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. [read post]