Search for: "Ehrenkranz v 58 MHR LLC"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2018, 4:24 am
Here, in Ehrenkranz v 58 MHR, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 01902 Decided on March 21, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department applied its version of JL 487 (which differs from the First Department’s version) and found that while there may have been some confusion, there was no intent to deceive. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:47 am
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action for violations of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Ehrenkranz v 58 MHR, LLC, 159 AD3d 872, 872; Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
Nor does the PAC plead any specific facts from which deceit or the intent to deceive may be inferred (see Ehrenkranz v 58 MHR, LLC, 159 AD3d 872, 872 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
