Search for: "El v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
However, they do not meet the substantiation requirements set forth by the Internal Revenue Code or the Treasury regulations. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis, heard 21-23 July 2015. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 541 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
Internal Revenue Service Publication 526 outlines what qualifies as a deductible charitable contribution, specifically excluding contributions from which one benefits, to the extent of that benefit. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, 20-21 May: US ACI ‘In-house counsel forum on pharmaceutical antitrust’ – Maryland: (Orange Book Blog), 26-27 May : EU Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), 27 May: Oliver Rivers to give short talk on ‘spurious precision’ – London: (IP finance), 28 May / 11June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – New… [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The challenged provisions amended the Internal Revenue Code by adding: (1) a "penalty" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by an individual taxpayer who failed to maintain adequate health insurance coverage and (2) an "assessable payment" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by a "large employer" if at least on of its employees received a tax credit or government subsidy to offset payments for certain health-related expenses. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
