Search for: "Elias v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am by Ben
The image and text above is from Elia's spoof. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:13 am
Stella Burch Elias, Comprehensive Immigration Reform(s): Immigration Regulation Beyond Our BordersLilian V. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by S S
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The Court of Appeal had already refused permission to appeal on this point some time ago in the case of Elias v Spencer (no relation!). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm by Giles Peaker
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm by Giles Peaker
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am by Anita Davies
The post Case Preview: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:26 am by CAJ
  In witness evidence, Mr Gill stated that he had Asperger’s syndrome but no medical evidence was adduced in support of this. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:26 am by CAJ
  In witness evidence, Mr Gill stated that he had Asperger’s syndrome but no medical evidence was adduced in support of this. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:26 am by Immigration Prof
The New Immigration Federalism by Stella Burch Elias, University of Iowa - College of Law October 1, 2013 Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 74, 2013 Abstract: The Supreme Court’s recent rulings in Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]