Search for: "Elliott v. Google, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2014, 9:13 am
Case citation: Elliott v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:17 pm
Elliott v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:01 am
Google, Inc., No. 15-15809. [read post]
16 May 2017, 11:16 am
Case citation: Elliott v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
” (See Elliott v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Kat jokes aside, this question was at the center of the recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) judgment in Elliott v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:08 am
A case that has dealt with the 'generification' or 'genericisation' of trademarks has been going on in the US for over 5 years (discussion on the first instance decision here), culminating in a Court of Appeal decision in mid-March.The case of Elliott v Google Inc. deals with the registration of over 760 domain names by David Elliot, which incorporated both the word "Google" and other well-known brands, such as Disney, in the… [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:51 am
In Elliot v Google, Inc., CV-12-1072-PHX-MHB, Elliot claims that Google’s once distinctive mark GOOGLE® has become generic and lacks trademark significance due to its common use as a transitive verb. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am
“Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am
“Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Tax Court (Tax Court No. 015675-11 BMC Software Inc. v Commissioner of Internal Revenue). [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Google, Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Canadian Supreme Court holds that Google can be ordered to de-index results globallyRecently the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision [Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34] in the important and longstanding litigation between Equustek Solutions and Google, concerning an issue that has become particularly sensitive over time: can Google be ordered to de-index results from its search engine globally, i.e. in… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
There were two Court of Appeal decisions in libel cases Cruddas v Calvert ([2015] EWCA Civ 171) – a decision on justification We had a case comment Rufus v Elliott ([2015] EWCA Civ 121) – a decision on meaning and capability (possibly the last in this once important area) There were two other decisions of note Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) – an important decision on data protection, see our case… [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:22 am
The other important media data protection case of the year was Mosley v Google Inc ([2015] EWHC 59 (QB)). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The first media and law case of the term is the hearing on 14 and 15 January 2015 of an application in the case of Mosley v Google Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm
Hegglin v Google Inc 5 day trial beginning on 24 November 2014. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
Second, there was the important data protection decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]