Search for: "Elliott v. Google, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
 Kat jokes aside, this question was at the center of the recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) judgment in Elliott v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
A case that has dealt with the 'generification' or 'genericisation' of trademarks has been going on in the US for over 5 years (discussion on the first instance decision here), culminating in a Court of Appeal decision in mid-March.The case of Elliott v Google Inc. deals with the registration of over 760 domain names by David Elliot, which incorporated both the word "Google" and other well-known brands, such as Disney, in the… [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:51 am by Geri Haight
In Elliot v Google, Inc., CV-12-1072-PHX-MHB, Elliot claims that Google’s once distinctive mark GOOGLE® has become generic and lacks trademark significance due to its common use as a transitive verb. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
  “Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
  “Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Tax Court (Tax Court No. 015675-11 BMC Software Inc. v Commissioner of Internal Revenue). [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
 Canadian Supreme Court holds that Google can be ordered to de-index results globallyRecently the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision [Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34] in the important and longstanding litigation between Equustek Solutions and Google, concerning an issue that has become particularly sensitive over time: can Google be ordered to de-index results from its search engine globally, i.e. in… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
There were two Court of Appeal decisions in libel cases Cruddas v Calvert ([2015] EWCA Civ 171) – a decision on justification We had a case comment Rufus v Elliott ([2015] EWCA Civ 121) – a decision on meaning and capability (possibly the last in this once important area) There were two other decisions of note Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) – an important decision on data protection, see our case… [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:22 am by INFORRM
  The other important media data protection case of the year was Mosley v Google Inc ([2015] EWHC 59 (QB)). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The first media and law case of the term is the hearing on 14 and 15 January 2015 of an application in the case of Mosley v Google Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Second, there was the important data protection decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]