Search for: "Ellis v. Wingate"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm
The Full Court said that for there to be use of a trademark there needed to be "a conscious resolve on the part of the person alleging ownership of future use in Australia".Lion Nathan relied on Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd vs Ellis and Goldstein Ltd (1967) 116 CLR 254. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
