Search for: "Emery v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 9:03 pm
Certainly it's no State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:55 am
The answer, according to Helie v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:40 pm
Cir. 1998), and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 1:40 am
Hooker v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:53 pm
On March 18, 2008, the Court decided the case of Washington State Grange v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:27 am
Emery, 34 F.3d 911, 913 (9th Cir.1994) (following Love ), with United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE: The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:20 am
On October 1st, 2007, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Washington State Grange v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The case was 2025 Emery Highway v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 6:30 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:11 am
Defendants relied on Emery v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
That report, prepared by FJC senior researchers Thomas Willging and Emery Lee III, was big news. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 4:42 pm
Fortunately for defendants, an earlier state case, Emery v. [read post]
