Search for: "Emis v. Emis" Results 41 - 60 of 297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Irish cases subsequent to the Ryanair applications have shown the breadth of the Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction (seeEMI v UPC [2013] IEHC 274 (12 June 2013) [cp EMI v Eircom [2005] 4 IR 148,[2005] IEHC 233 (8 July 2005)]; O’Brien v Red Flag Consulting Ltd [2015] IEHC 867 (21 December 2015); Petroceltic v Aut O’Mattic (above); see also Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers [2014] 1 Ch 400, [2013] EWHC 2119 (Ch) (12 July 2013)). [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
  The panel provided a brief reminder of the key UK and CJEU cases dealing with the meaning of (1) an act of “communication” and (2) a “public”, both in the context of re-transmission of broadcast signals (SGAE v Rafael Hotels Case C-306/05, SCF v Marco Del Corso Case C-135/10, ITV v TV Catchup Case C-607/11 and Reha Training v GEMA Case C-117/5) and P2P networks (Polydor v… [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
 Indeed, in his 2010 judgment in EMI Records, Charleton J had concluded that Irish courts lacked jurisdiction to order non-infringing ISPs to take action against customers who used their services for the purposes of copyright infringement. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 8:09 am by Siobhan Hayes and Indeg Kerr
It is now clear that leases cannot be assigned to the tenant’s guarantor but serious issues arise out of the recent High Court case of EMI Group Limited v O&H Q1 Limited which specified that any lease assignment by a tenant to its guarantor is void. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
 Total damages could amount to $420 million based on the court's finding that 2,807 EMI-copyrighted sound recordings existed on Grooveshark's servers. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Resultly http://t.co/R7rhwI0Xqo -> GA Supreme Court Fixes Overbroad Injunction Against Message Board Operator–Chan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
In the USA, the MPAA and RIAA are backing a new copyright curriculum showing kids how to become "Ethical Digital Citizens. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:35 am by Eleonora Rosati
In addition Birss J followed Arnold J’s approach in EMI v BSkyB when considering what elements should be taken into account to determine whether a certain website is targeted at a specific public, including the number of visitors. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:57 am
He observed that: "It is common ground [see paras 48 to 51 of the judgment of Arnold J in EMI v BSkyB] that if they are targeted at the UK then infringement of UK copyright has been committed by the first defendant. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Darius Whelan
Hogan J. distinguished this case from the case of EMI v UPC [2013] IEHC 204, where DRI was not added as amicus curiae. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Ben
 Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am by Ben
 He is being held in a high security prison in Västervik, although he recently requested a transfer to a lower safety class unit. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
The former chief executive was found liable for infringing copyrights for sound recordings, compositions and cover art owned by record companies and music publishers once part of EMI Group Ltd. [read post]