Search for: "Emis v. Emis" Results 81 - 100 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2017, 1:51 am by Imogen Garner and Gavin Punia
Specifically the FCA proposes to: direct that PSPs follow the European Banking Authority’s guidelines on major incidents reporting under PSD2 to notify the FCA of major operational or security incidents; update the capital returns for authorised payment institutions (PIs) and e-money issuers (EMIs) to reflect new PSD2 requirements around how own funds can be met; make rules requiring records to be kept by banks and building societies on their account information services and payment… [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 11:26 am by Jake Linford
The recent decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:09 am by Jake Linford
See, for example, EMI Catalogue Partnership v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
 Total damages could amount to $420 million based on the court's finding that 2,807 EMI-copyrighted sound recordings existed on Grooveshark's servers. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:24 am
  All too long ago, Rory Flynn became entitled to a katpat for sending the IPKat this judgment in EMI Records (Ireland) Ltd and others v UPC Communications Ltd and others in which EMI was allowed to compel the various Irish ISPs to block the Pirate Bay file-sharing website. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
In the first case, EMI (IP) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here, the facts were as follows. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:58 am
Während Napster Zugriff auf das EMI-Repertoire erhält, kann Celas mit diesem Deal einen Achtungserfolg vorweien. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:43 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
The guide follows a regulatory review of EMIs announced in June 2011 and a subsequent report setting out the results of the OSC's review published in March of this year. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
In the first case, EMI (IP) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here, the facts were as follows. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:31 am
District Courts for the Eastern or Western District of Arkansas was chosen as the forum for litigating the following case(s), as published by Justia: Arista Records LLC et al v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:40 pm
The Law Blog just returned from New York State Supreme Court — a/k/a/ New York’s trial court, a/k/a the “Law & Order” court — where we sat in on a preliminary injunction hearing in the case of EMI Records v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 10:12 am
It is perhaps eccentric if not downright ungrateful to promote a different business model for the music and motion picture industries having rebuilt my practice on advising and representing defendants to copyright infringement claims by trade associations in those industries but a flower is a great deal cheaper than an intellectual property lawyer and not necessarily less effective.   [read post]