Search for: "Employment Division v. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2008, 12:24 am
Violating workplace rules Smith v Commissioner of Labor, App. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:10 am
Failure to file prehearing statements required by the reviewing agency’s rules held to constitute a “waiver of defenses”Matter of Smith v Albany County Sheriff's Dept., 2011 NY Slip Op 01559, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentRaymond C. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:04 am
Lunchtime injuriesSmith v City of Rochester, 255 AD2d 863Donna Smith, a City of Rochester parking monitor, slipped on a wet floor and fell while leaving a restaurant during an unpaid lunch break. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:51 am by Steve Shiffrin
Despite the Court's infamous decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:45 am by Paul Horwitz
Smith; and ask whether we might not view arguments for "freedom of the church" as a kind of salvaging device for those who favor a "soft" or jurisdictional reading of the Establishment Clause, and who have come around on Employment Division v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:48 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: In 1990, the Supreme Court decided Employment Division v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:02 am by Jeanne Hannah
In a recent Michigan Court of Appeals case, Maher v Maher, Wife [“W”] claimed that a Smith Barney investment account titled to both parties was marital property. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 12:37 am
(Because of what the Supreme Court did in Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 7:06 pm by Howard Friedman
"  In the area of First Amendment religious freedom decisions, Justice Scalia will be particularly remembered as the author of the majority  opinion in Employment Division v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Termination for violating workplace rules defeats a claim for unemployment insurance benefits Smith v Commissioner of Labor, 296 A.D.2d 803 Violating the employer's policy or work rules concerning sexual harassment may not only result in the termination of the employee. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:13 am
The case was particularly interesting because at least in some quarters it was viewed as the opportunity to repudiate what is left of the still controversial decision of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]